- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Canada’s international posture on human rights : consequences...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Canada’s international posture on human rights : consequences in the domestic domain Hunter, Rebecca Winesanker
Abstract
A fundamental tension exists today between the increasing willingness of states to participate in international efforts to protect fundamental human rights, and their desire to retain control over internal laws and procedures. Canada, as an active participant in international human rights regimes, has assumed numerous international obligations which have not for the most part been directly incorporated into Canadian law. Canadian law has traditionally drawn a distinction between the international obligations which Canada has undertaken as a party to international treaties, and the individual domestic rights which may be enforced in Canadian courts. In recent years, however, this distinction has become blurred. At present, the international human rights instruments to which Canada is a party have an uneasy place in Canadian law. Many courts in Canada are unfamiliar with the provisions of these instruments. In recent years the Supreme Court of Canada has increasingly demonstrated a willingness to refer to international conventions, particularly as aids in interpreting the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but the articulation of the impact of international human rights law on domestic law remains less than clear. Canada has accepted the competence of international treaty bodies to adjudicate upon individual complaints alleging violations of international human rights obligations by Canada, yet Canada's responses to the views and requests of these treaty bodies has been inconsistent. The result is a lack of clarity regarding Canada's policies on implementation of its international human rights obligations. Questions are increasingly being raised in relation to the domestic impact of Canada's international posture on human rights. It is time that the Government of Canada recognize that there are serious issues that need to be addressed and reflect upon what steps might be taken to achieve a more rational, effective approach to the assumption and implementation of international human rights obligations. Four areas which the Government should examine in this regard are the pressing need for informed public debate, changes to the ratification process, the positions advanced before domestic courts, and the need to improve the credibility of the international treaty body process.
Item Metadata
Title |
Canada’s international posture on human rights : consequences in the domestic domain
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1999
|
Description |
A fundamental tension exists today between the increasing willingness of states to participate
in international efforts to protect fundamental human rights, and their desire to retain control over
internal laws and procedures. Canada, as an active participant in international human rights regimes,
has assumed numerous international obligations which have not for the most part been directly
incorporated into Canadian law. Canadian law has traditionally drawn a distinction between the
international obligations which Canada has undertaken as a party to international treaties, and the
individual domestic rights which may be enforced in Canadian courts. In recent years, however, this
distinction has become blurred.
At present, the international human rights instruments to which Canada is a party have an
uneasy place in Canadian law. Many courts in Canada are unfamiliar with the provisions of these
instruments. In recent years the Supreme Court of Canada has increasingly demonstrated a
willingness to refer to international conventions, particularly as aids in interpreting the Charter of
Rights and Freedoms, but the articulation of the impact of international human rights law on domestic
law remains less than clear. Canada has accepted the competence of international treaty bodies to
adjudicate upon individual complaints alleging violations of international human rights obligations by
Canada, yet Canada's responses to the views and requests of these treaty bodies has been
inconsistent. The result is a lack of clarity regarding Canada's policies on implementation of its
international human rights obligations.
Questions are increasingly being raised in relation to the domestic impact of Canada's
international posture on human rights. It is time that the Government of Canada recognize that there
are serious issues that need to be addressed and reflect upon what steps might be taken to achieve
a more rational, effective approach to the assumption and implementation of international human
rights obligations. Four areas which the Government should examine in this regard are the pressing
need for informed public debate, changes to the ratification process, the positions advanced before
domestic courts, and the need to improve the credibility of the international treaty body process.
|
Extent |
12623628 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-07-06
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0077568
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
2000-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.