Go to  Advanced Search

The effect of idiopathic Parkinson's disease on seated trunk reactions

Show full item record

Files in this item

Files Size Format Description   View
ubc_2008_fall_pauhl_katherine.pdf 13.99Mb Adobe Portable Document Format   View/Open
 
Title: The effect of idiopathic Parkinson's disease on seated trunk reactions
Author: Pauhl, Katherine Elizabeth
Degree Master of Science - MSc
Program Human Kinetics
Copyright Date: 2008
Publicly Available in cIRcle 2008-08-01
Subject Keywords Postural control; Parkinson's disease
Abstract: A common symptom of Idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (IPD) is decreased trunk and balance control. These deficits in patients with IPD are not treatable, and their underlying mechanisms are not well understood. Additionally, it is not known to what extent decreased trunk control contributes to postural instability in patients with IPD. Previous work by Martin (1965) observed that patients with post-encephalitatic Parkinson’s disease would fall in the direction of the tilt when perturbed while seated. In order to better understand the underlying causes of these observed trunk deficits and attempt to replicate Martins findings, this study investigated postural corrective movement of the trunk while seated in patients with IPD and age-matched healthy controls. Participants’ range of motion (ROM) was tested actively and passively while lying supine, following which, bilateral electromyography (EMG) (rectus abdominis (RA), external oblique (EO), and erector spinae (EST9, L3)) and 3-D kinematic measures were recorded while participants were seated on a modified chair and received unexpected perturbations, 7° at 40°/sec, in four different directions (forward, backward, left, and right). EMG responses were normalized to participant’s maximum voluntary contractions. We observed patients with IPD to have decreased active and passive ROM only in the frontal plane relative to controls. Patterning of muscle responses to rotational perturbations did not vary between groups in any direction, except backward, and trends toward significantly greater EST9 activity were observed during backward and left tilts in patients with IPD. Despite this both patients with IPD and controls were able to make appropriate trunk corrective movements opposite the direction of the tilt. However, two patients, who were most severely affected, did make incorrect trunk movements in the direction of the tilt during left and right tilting perturbations which, upon visual inspection, appear to be due to improperly modulated and timed muscle responses. Thus, our data counters the findings of Martin, and suggests the trunk is posturally stable in IPD. Therefore, balance instabilities during stance are likely due to improper responses of the lower limbs. However, as disease severity increases, the contributing influence of an improperly responding trunk may add to their postural deficits.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1242

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

All items in cIRcle are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

UBC Library
1961 East Mall
Vancouver, B.C.
Canada V6T 1Z1
Tel: 604-822-6375
Fax: 604-822-3893