Go to  Advanced Search

The perils of parsimony. "National culture" as red herring?

Show full item record

Files in this item

Files Size Format Description   View
MacfadyenLPcatac2008.pdf 194.3Kb Adobe Portable Document Format   View/Open
Title: The perils of parsimony. "National culture" as red herring?
Author: Macfadyen, Leah P.
Subject Keywords Hofstede;national culture;functionalist paradigm;Hacking;Hall;dynamic nominalism;articulation
Issue Date: 2008
Publicly Available in cIRcle 2008-08-09
Citation: Proceedings, Cultural Attitudes to Technology and Communication, Nimes, France, June 2008.
Abstract: This paper discusses the ways in which Hofstede’s model of ‘dimensions of (‘national’) culture’ – and similar models developed in a functionalist paradigm – are problematically used to classify people. It briefly surveys critiques of Hofstede’s research method, but focusses on the dangers of attempting to develop models of culture within a functionalist paradigm. Although such models may be parsimonious and rapidly applied, I argue that they are a poor fit for CATaC investigations of the dynamic and reciprocal interactions between human cultures and technology. Instead, I contend, we must abandon this paradigm, and embrace methodologies that permit meaningfully explorations of the multiple and dynamic conditions influencing the field of cultural practices in human societies. I discuss the merits of ‘articulation’ as theory and method, and offer Hacking’s theory of “dynamic nominalism” as one example.
Affiliation: Skylight
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/1335
Peer Review Status: Peer-Reviewed

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

All items in cIRcle are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

UBC Library
1961 East Mall
Vancouver, B.C.
Canada V6T 1Z1
Tel: 604-822-6375
Fax: 604-822-3893