- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- L1 orthography and ESL literacy : a comparison of English,...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
L1 orthography and ESL literacy : a comparison of English, Persian, and Chinese L1 speakers Low, Pauline B.
Abstract
Orthographies vary in how sounds are translated to print. Alphabetic orthographies utilize grapheme-phoneme correspondences, whereas nonalphabetic orthographies do not. The present study examined whether learning to read and spell in English as a second language was influenced by the learner's first language. The participants were 122 third-grade children (mean age: 8.88 years) with contrasting linguistic backgrounds. The sample was comprised of 45 children who's native language was English (alphabetic), 32 ESL children who's native language was Persian (alphabetic) and 45 ESL children who's native language was Chinese (nonalphabetic). The performance of the three groups was comparable on measures of reading, phonological awareness, decoding, working memory and spelling. However, the Chinese speakers scored significantly lower than the alphabetic speakers on measures of syntactic awareness and pseudoword spelling. Misspelling error analyses further revealed that although the Chinese speakers were as likely as the alphabetic speakers to produce misspellings that resembled target words in visual form and individual phonemes, they were less likely to produce misspellings that can be read to sound exactly like the target words. In addition, there was evidence for the importance of phonological reading skills, working memory and syntactic awareness in establishing a common model of spelling for children from diverse linguistic backgrounds. Overall, the findings suggest that children learning to read and spell in English as a second language are not necessarily at a disadvantage even if the structure of their first language significantly differs from that of English. However, there may be qualitative differences strategies used to spell that are attributable to differences in grapheme-phoneme mapping experience.
Item Metadata
Title |
L1 orthography and ESL literacy : a comparison of English, Persian, and Chinese L1 speakers
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2006
|
Description |
Orthographies vary in how sounds are translated to print. Alphabetic orthographies
utilize grapheme-phoneme correspondences, whereas nonalphabetic orthographies do not. The
present study examined whether learning to read and spell in English as a second language
was influenced by the learner's first language. The participants were 122 third-grade children
(mean age: 8.88 years) with contrasting linguistic backgrounds. The sample was comprised of
45 children who's native language was English (alphabetic), 32 ESL children who's native
language was Persian (alphabetic) and 45 ESL children who's native language was Chinese
(nonalphabetic). The performance of the three groups was comparable on measures of reading,
phonological awareness, decoding, working memory and spelling. However, the Chinese
speakers scored significantly lower than the alphabetic speakers on measures of syntactic
awareness and pseudoword spelling. Misspelling error analyses further revealed that although
the Chinese speakers were as likely as the alphabetic speakers to produce misspellings that
resembled target words in visual form and individual phonemes, they were less likely to produce
misspellings that can be read to sound exactly like the target words. In addition, there was
evidence for the importance of phonological reading skills, working memory and syntactic
awareness in establishing a common model of spelling for children from diverse linguistic
backgrounds. Overall, the findings suggest that children learning to read and spell in English as
a second language are not necessarily at a disadvantage even if the structure of their first
language significantly differs from that of English. However, there may be qualitative differences strategies used to spell that are attributable to differences in grapheme-phoneme mapping
experience.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2010-01-05
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0054489
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
2006-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.