Go to  Advanced Search

The Action-project differentiation procedure : extending the method of analysis in action theory to allow for the examination of similarities and differences among sets of cases

Show full item record

Files in this item

Files Size Format Description   View
ubc_2005-103884.pdf 9.707Mb Adobe Portable Document Format   View/Open
 
Title: The Action-project differentiation procedure : extending the method of analysis in action theory to allow for the examination of similarities and differences among sets of cases
Author: Domene, José Francisco
Degree Doctor of Philosophy - PhD
Program Measurement Evaluation and Research Methodology
Copyright Date: 2005
Abstract: Although between-groups comparisons are a mainstay in quantitative research methods, their legitimacy within qualitative research is more tenuous. In this methodological dissertation, I explore the issue of between-groups comparative analysis within Young, Valach, and colleagues' contextual action theory research framework, in order to extend the existing action-project method of conducting social research to encompass mechanisms for examining similarities and differences between distinct groups of cases. To focus my methods-development work, I ask two specific questions, (a) "Are between-groups comparisons compatible with the assumptions that underlie the action theory paradigm?" and, (b) "What specific procedures could be used within these analyses, to generate findings that go beyond those which are attainable within the existing method?" To address these questions, I first examine the possibilities and problems with conducting between-groups comparative analyses in different forms of social constructionist research, including the action-project method. After establishing that some forms of between-groups comparison are compatible with action theory, I present a novel method for engaging in such analyses, the action-project differentiation procedure, and demonstrate its application to an existing data set. The major findings of this dissertation are: (a) between-groups comparative analyses that retain the full configuration of information from all cases are compatible with this form of qualitative research; and (b) the procedure I have developed is capable of generating useful, trustworthy findings. I conclude with some suggestions for further refinement of the action-differentiation procedure, and a discussion of the broader implications of shifting the previously existing analytical method in this direction.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/18327
Series/Report no. UBC Retrospective Theses Digitization Project [http://www.library.ubc.ca/archives/retro_theses/]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

All items in cIRcle are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

UBC Library
1961 East Mall
Vancouver, B.C.
Canada V6T 1Z1
Tel: 604-822-6375
Fax: 604-822-3893