Go to  Advanced Search

Please note that cIRcle is currently being upgraded to DSpace v5.1. The upgrade means that the cIRcle service will *not* be accepting new submissions from 5:00 PM on September 1, 2015 until 5:00 PM on September 4, 2015. All cIRcle material will still be accessible during this period. Apologies for any inconvenience.

Evaluation of bioindicators and structural attributes as indicators of old-growth forests

Show full item record

Files in this item

Files Size Format Description   View
Anderson_Meghan_CONS_498_2008.pdf 217.5Kb Adobe Portable Document Format   View/Open
Title: Evaluation of bioindicators and structural attributes as indicators of old-growth forests
Author: Anderson, Meghan
Subject Keywords Species indicators;Ecological indicators;Old-growth index;Ecological continuity
Issue Date: 2009-04-24
Publicly Available in cIRcle 2010-09-21
Series/Report no. University of British Columbia, Forestry Undergraduate Essays/Theses, 2008 winter session, CONS 498
Abstract: There is a lack of practical and accurate tools for identifying old-growth forests that are of important conservation value. In order to achieve more accurate methods for identifying old-growth forests, species and structural attributes of forests have been suggested as indicators. To assess which indicators among those commonly used for old-growth may be most practical and applicable a system of evaluating the indicators based on biological traits and current research was done. Species evaluated were saproxylic beetles, wood-inhabiting fungi, bryophytes and lichen. Structural attributes evaluated were dead wood measured, wildlife values, diameter at breast height (DBH), tree density and basal area. Indicators were evaluated on the basis of 15 criteria. None of the indicators were able to fulfill all criteria. The indicators that were able to fulfill most criteria were saproxylic beetles and lichen (67%) followed by structural indicators (64%). Evaluation of indicators suggests that saproxylic beetles and lichen used in concert may more suitable indicators for indicating old-growth forests, where as structural indicators may be less suitable but a more practical method. However, species indicators are unreliable and more research is required to determine their accuracy and improve their reliability.
Affiliation: Forestry, Faculty of
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/28607
Peer Review Status: Unreviewed
Scholarly Level: Undergraduate

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

All items in cIRcle are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

UBC Library
1961 East Mall
Vancouver, B.C.
Canada V6T 1Z1
Tel: 604-822-6375
Fax: 604-822-3893