- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- The perception of disordered /[inverted r]/ of children...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
The perception of disordered /[inverted r]/ of children in speech therapy by peers and speech-language pathologists Perry, Benjamin
Abstract
Subjective rating is the main method for measuring treatment effect for speech disorders in therapy and research. For complicated speech sounds such as /ɹ/, perceptual judgments by ear are subject to variability. The main goals of the current study were twofold: (1) to compare age peer and speech-language pathologist judgments of /ɹ/ as spoken by children receiving speech therapy for /ɹ/, and (2) to compare those listener judgments in both a single stimulus identification task and a two-stimulus paired comparison task. Sixteen syllables with /r/ were presented by computer over headphones in the two tasks to 24 children (mean age 9 years) and 24 speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Variability, group and task differences were examined. Mean judgments of the tokens by SLPs and children were similar. Intra-rater reliability was better for SLPs than children. In the single stimulus identification task, SLPs also showed better inter-rater reliability than children. In the two-stimulus paired comparison task, SLPs and children had similar inter-rater reliability. Overall, the comparison task resulted in better inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for both groups. Implications for research and clinical evaluation of attempted /ɹ/ are discussed.
Item Metadata
Title |
The perception of disordered /[inverted r]/ of children in speech therapy by peers and speech-language pathologists
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
2007
|
Description |
Subjective rating is the main method for measuring treatment effect for speech disorders
in therapy and research. For complicated speech sounds such as /ɹ/, perceptual judgments by ear are subject to variability. The main goals of the current study were twofold: (1) to
compare age peer and speech-language pathologist judgments of /ɹ/ as spoken by children receiving speech therapy for /ɹ/, and (2) to compare those listener judgments in both a single stimulus identification task and a two-stimulus paired comparison task. Sixteen syllables with /r/ were presented by computer over headphones in the two tasks to 24 children (mean age 9 years) and 24 speech-language pathologists (SLPs). Variability, group and task differences were examined. Mean judgments of the tokens by SLPs and children were similar. Intra-rater reliability was better for SLPs than children. In the single stimulus identification task, SLPs also showed better inter-rater reliability than children. In the two-stimulus paired comparison task, SLPs and children had similar inter-rater reliability. Overall, the comparison task resulted in better inter-rater and intra-rater reliability for both groups. Implications for research and clinical evaluation of attempted /ɹ/ are discussed.
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2011-03-04
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0101017
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.