- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Hypocrisy and heresy : language and concepts in early...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Hypocrisy and heresy : language and concepts in early modern England Stewart, Patricia Weightman
Abstract
The two concepts of hypocrisy and heresy are completely disparate in modern use, and yet they were related in two ways during the early modern period. Firstly, both terms were prominent charges in the polemical exchanges of the English Reformation. Consequently, in this thesis they provide useful tools for studying the effects of controversy on language. The meaning of hypocrisy and of heresy was of considerable concern to many controversialists, and yet the resulting attempts at defining these terms contributed to their destabilization and incoherence. These terms were also related in a second respect throughout the early modern period. Given the universal conviction at that time that there was only one “true” church, and given the consequent pressures imposed by churches (both Catholic and Protestant) to enforce conformity to their own religions, it was inevitable that judgements had to be made concerning the convictions and internal beliefs of others. Such judgements were central in charges of heresy and hypocrisy; hence in this thesis the concepts of hypocrisy and heresy provide useful tools for studying early modern understandings of intentionality and judgement. The writings of Sir John Cheke, William Perkins, Bishop Joseph Hall and Sir Francis Bacon are shown to display concern combined with confusion and incoherence over these topics. However, Sir Thomas More’s Dialogue Concerning Heresies is shown to contain an intricate and coherent analysis of intentionality and judgement vis a vis heresy. But, More’s foundation for judgement and knowledge was the consensus fidelium, a foundation which simply was not available to the later Protestant writers. Lastly, Thomas Hobbes’s treatments of hypocrisy and heresy are examined. In effect, Hobbes negated the judgement of intentions where both concepts were concerned. He acknowledged and accepted the separation of internal belief from external profession. Likewise he accepted the impenetrable nature of the human mind and heart in a way his forebears had not. By examining Hobbes’s treatment of these concepts in light of the polemical confusion and conceptual incoherence of the preceeding century, a better understanding of Hobbes’s philosophy is obtained and the relevance of early modern theology for intellectual history is demonstrated.
Item Metadata
Title |
Hypocrisy and heresy : language and concepts in early modern England
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1992
|
Description |
The two concepts of hypocrisy and heresy are completely
disparate in modern use, and yet they were related in two ways
during the early modern period. Firstly, both terms were
prominent charges in the polemical exchanges of the English
Reformation. Consequently, in this thesis they provide useful
tools for studying the effects of controversy on language.
The meaning of hypocrisy and of heresy was of considerable
concern to many controversialists, and yet the resulting
attempts at defining these terms contributed to their
destabilization and incoherence.
These terms were also related in a second respect
throughout the early modern period. Given the universal
conviction at that time that there was only one “true” church,
and given the consequent pressures imposed by churches (both
Catholic and Protestant) to enforce conformity to their own
religions, it was inevitable that judgements had to be made
concerning the convictions and internal beliefs of others.
Such judgements were central in charges of heresy and
hypocrisy; hence in this thesis the concepts of hypocrisy and
heresy provide useful tools for studying early modern
understandings of intentionality and judgement. The writings
of Sir John Cheke, William Perkins, Bishop Joseph Hall and Sir
Francis Bacon are shown to display concern combined with
confusion and incoherence over these topics. However, Sir
Thomas More’s Dialogue Concerning Heresies is shown to contain an intricate and coherent analysis of intentionality and
judgement vis a vis heresy. But, More’s foundation for
judgement and knowledge was the consensus fidelium, a
foundation which simply was not available to the later
Protestant writers.
Lastly, Thomas Hobbes’s treatments of hypocrisy and
heresy are examined. In effect, Hobbes negated the judgement
of intentions where both concepts were concerned. He
acknowledged and accepted the separation of internal belief
from external profession. Likewise he accepted the
impenetrable nature of the human mind and heart in a way his
forebears had not. By examining Hobbes’s treatment of these
concepts in light of the polemical confusion and conceptual
incoherence of the preceeding century, a better understanding
of Hobbes’s philosophy is obtained and the relevance of early
modern theology for intellectual history is demonstrated.
|
Extent |
3617870 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2008-12-19
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0086647
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1992-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.