Go to  Advanced Search

An environmental comparison of foam-core and hollow wood surfboards : carbon emissions and other toxic chemicals

Show full item record

Files in this item

Files Size Format Description   View
Hole_Blair_WOOD_493_Project_2010.pdf 862.2Kb Adobe Portable Document Format   View/Open
Title: An environmental comparison of foam-core and hollow wood surfboards : carbon emissions and other toxic chemicals
Author: Hole, Blair
Subject Keywords surfboards;foam;surfboard construction;life-cycle assessment (LCA);emission
Issue Date: 2011-04-18
Publicly Available in cIRcle 2011-07-20
Series/Report no. University of British Columbia, Forestry Undergraduate Essays/Theses, 2010 winter session, WOOD 493
Abstract: Surfers in general are viewed as environmentally conscious individuals; however the boards that almost all of them ride are not considered green. In the past few years there has been a movement in the industry to find alternatives to the foam/fibreglass construction of surfboards. This movement was sparked by the closing of Clark Foam in 2005, the largest producer and supplier in the U.S. of polyurethane foam surfboard blanks. The plant was forced to shut down because of increasing environmental regulations. In 2008 a life-cycle analysis of the most common types of surfboards was performed to find out how this product was effecting the environment. There has been extensive research into new foam technology for boards since 2005, however, I believe that wood is a good alternative for surfboard construction. This paper includes a life-cycle assessment (LCA) to determine the emissions from wood board production and compares them to that of classic foam boards. The results show that wood surfboard production produces far less emissions of CO2, CO, SO2, NOx, VOC, and PM10 than foam surfboard production does. The LCA of wood boards included raw material production as well as production and assembly of the board itself. It can be concluded that from an environmental standpoint wood surfboards are a much better choice than the foam boards in use now.
Affiliation: Forestry, Faculty ofWood Science, Department of
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/36219
Peer Review Status: Unreviewed
Scholarly Level: Undergraduate

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

UBC Library
1961 East Mall
Vancouver, B.C.
Canada V6T 1Z1
Tel: 604-822-6375
Fax: 604-822-3893