Go to  Advanced Search

Walking the talk? Models of disability and discourse in employment policy for Canadians with disabilities

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Vellacott, John Wright
dc.date.accessioned 2011-08-18T16:48:21Z
dc.date.available 2011-08-18T16:48:21Z
dc.date.copyright 2011 en_US
dc.date.issued 2011-08-18
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2429/36758
dc.description.abstract The research undertaken in this thesis facilitated an examination of the dominant discourses contained in several disability policy documents, the ideological underpinnings driving the discourses and the influence of particular models of disability. This investigation demonstrated that there were in fact two dominant discourses common to all the policy texts, namely a discourse of Independence and a discourse of Employability. These evolved from a status of being overtly referenced within the policy texts to becoming an underlying “given” or “truth”. While the language of various models of disability were used in the texts, there is little evidence to suggest that any particular model had any singular influence. Rather, the use of the language of various models of disability appeared to be “tactical” in nature, and used simply to enhance the legitimacy of the particular discourses or arguments being presented. As the texts appeared to be grounded within a neoliberal policy orientation, the use of the language of the models, particularly the social model of disability, was of value in providing legitimacy to concepts that are in many ways antithetical to some of the core precepts of the models. Lastly, the analysis suggests that the actors with the greatest degree of power and influence during the drafting and implementation of the policy texts remained government officials, and the influence of people with disabilities or their advocates was at best subordinate, or in many cases nonexistent. Through this type of research, policy researchers, advocates and impacted individuals with disabilities who endure the effects of policy, have powerful tools with which to expose these dominant discourses. Often these dominant discourses have evolved into unspoken and taken for granted "truths". Foregrounding such discourses can facilitate the development of counter discourses or strategies to negate or at least minimize the negative impacts that result from policy and program decisions grounded in these discourses. Such a capacity could go a long way in leveling the playing field, and at least to some degree equalize the power differential between government and “others” when presented with skillfully written and often dissembling policy texts. en_US
dc.language.iso eng en_US
dc.publisher University of British Columbia en
dc.title Walking the talk? Models of disability and discourse in employment policy for Canadians with disabilities en_US
dc.type Electronic Thesis or Dissertation en
dc.degree.name Doctor of Education - EdD en_US
dc.degree.discipline Educational Leadership and Policy en_US
dc.degree.grantor University of British Columbia en
dc.date.graduation 2011-11 en_US
dc.degree.campus UBCV en_US
dc.description.scholarlevel Graduate en


Files in this item

Files Size Format Description   View
ubc_2011_fall_vellacott_john.pdf 2.397Mb Adobe Portable Document Format   View/Open
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

All items in cIRcle are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

UBC Library
1961 East Mall
Vancouver, B.C.
Canada V6T 1Z1
Tel: 604-822-6375
Fax: 604-822-3893