- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Measuring treatment adherence of Experiential Systemic...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Measuring treatment adherence of Experiential Systemic Therapy and Supported Feedback Therapy in the Alcohol Recovery Project Thompson, James Edward
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to answer three research questions concerning the measurement of treatment adherence of Experiential Systemic Therapy (ExST) and Supported Feedback Therapy (SFT) in the Alcohol Recovery Project. First, is the Adherence Rating Scale Reliable and Valid? Second, to what extent do the therapists adhere to and emulate the respective treatments described in the ExST and SFT manuals? Third, are individual and couple's ExST treatment, as performed, mdistinguishable from one another and different than SFT treatment? Observer ratings of 120 video taped sessions were used to establish reliability and validity of tating scale, and to measure treatment adherence in terms of extensiveness, emulation and distinctiveness. A cluster analysis of the session profiles was conducted, establishing clear support for adherence and emulation. The clusters differentiated between ExST and SFT treatment modalities for 97% of the sessions, and did not differentiate between individual and couple's ExST. Treatment modality was also shown to be highly related to cluster indicating high levels of adherence.
Item Metadata
Title |
Measuring treatment adherence of Experiential Systemic Therapy and Supported Feedback Therapy in the Alcohol Recovery Project
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1995
|
Description |
The purpose of this study was to answer three research questions
concerning the measurement of treatment adherence of Experiential Systemic
Therapy (ExST) and Supported Feedback Therapy (SFT) in the Alcohol Recovery
Project. First, is the Adherence Rating Scale Reliable and Valid? Second, to
what extent do the therapists adhere to and emulate the respective treatments
described in the ExST and SFT manuals? Third, are individual and couple's
ExST treatment, as performed, mdistinguishable from one another and
different than SFT treatment?
Observer ratings of 120 video taped sessions were used to establish
reliability and validity of tating scale, and to measure treatment adherence in
terms of extensiveness, emulation and distinctiveness. A cluster analysis of
the session profiles was conducted, establishing clear support for adherence
and emulation. The clusters differentiated between ExST and SFT treatment
modalities for 97% of the sessions, and did not differentiate between individual
and couple's ExST. Treatment modality was also shown to be highly related to
cluster indicating high levels of adherence.
|
Extent |
9384023 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-01-16
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0054142
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1995-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.