Go to  Advanced Search

You want me to do what? : ethical dilemmas for sign language interpreters in Canadian post-secondary education

Show full item record

Files in this item

Files Size Format Description   View
West_Miriam_EDST_590_Grad_Paper_2011.pdf 519.8Kb Adobe Portable Document Format   View/Open
 
Title: You want me to do what? : ethical dilemmas for sign language interpreters in Canadian post-secondary education
Author: West, Miriam
Issue Date: 2011-12
Publicly Available in cIRcle 2011-12-19
Series/Report no. University of British Columbia, Graduate paper, 2011 Winter Term 1, EDST 590
Abstract: Personal discussions with American Sign Language/English interpreters who work in post-secondary settings and the institutional employees who contract their services revealed discrepancies between the services interpreters typically provide and the services the institutional employees typically expect of interpreters. At the centre of this relationship are guidelines, established to assist in the provision of services for d/Deaf and hard of hearing students. While the guidelines sought to introduce standards and improve service provision, countering guidelines with the AVLIC Code of Ethics and Guidelines for Professional Conduct revealed inconsistencies that served to place interpreters in ethical dilemmas. The role of the institutional employee, responsible for contracting interpreting services, is key to students attaining not only appropriate services, but a more inclusive education. Given the current models of service delivery though, the chances of an institutional employee having the necessary knowledge, and employment status, to provide this kind of support is low. In the spirit of improving the working relationships between and among interpreters, and institutional employees, the first step is recognizing that the guidelines serve to place both at a disadvantage. Perhaps the most challenging, problems are embedded in the guidelines making it difficult for any one stakeholder to discern. With an awareness of the discrepancies, stakeholders will have the tools to better understand each other’s positions and the means to build more constructive working relationships.
Affiliation: Educational Studies (EDST), Dept of
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/2429/39781
Peer Review Status: Unreviewed
Scholarly Level: Graduate

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show full item record

All items in cIRcle are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

UBC Library
1961 East Mall
Vancouver, B.C.
Canada V6T 1Z1
Tel: 604-822-6375
Fax: 604-822-3893