- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Undergraduate Research /
- An investigation into induction stovetops versus gas...
Open Collections
UBC Undergraduate Research
An investigation into induction stovetops versus gas stovetops Qin, Lei; Wang, Meng; Zheng, Zhong; Yang, Meng
Abstract
Although gas stovetop has been the dominant cooking appliance in the past few decades, they can no longer satisfy the current society’s sustainability standards. Induction stovetop on the other hand is a great sustainable alternative. The focus of this report is a detailed triple-bottom line assessment between gas and induction stovetops that the new Student Union Building at the University of British Columbia will be choosing. To demonstrate validity, information presented in this report is based on library research and expert interviews. The triple-bottom line assessment between the gas and induction stovetops features a combination of environmental, economical, and social analysis. Induction stovetop is environmentally sustainable as it produces no greenhouse gas emission, consumes less energy and eliminates ecological footprint. Economically, the induction stovetop costs 10% less than its gas counterpart. Finally, induction stovetop is socially sustainable since it has negligible side effects, and does not put its users in danger of gas leakage and heat exposure. The advantages of the induction stovetop allow the new UBC Student Union Building to function as a more sustainable unit. As a result, the new SUB can better serve students and teachers providing a more enjoyable experience during their time at UBC. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”
Item Metadata
Title |
An investigation into induction stovetops versus gas stovetops
|
Creator | |
Contributor | |
Date Issued |
2012
|
Description |
Although gas stovetop has been the dominant cooking appliance in the past few
decades, they can no longer satisfy the current society’s sustainability standards.
Induction stovetop on the other hand is a great sustainable alternative. The focus of this
report is a detailed triple-bottom line assessment between gas and induction stovetops
that the new Student Union Building at the University of British Columbia will be
choosing. To demonstrate validity, information presented in this report is based on library
research and expert interviews.
The triple-bottom line assessment between the gas and induction stovetops
features a combination of environmental, economical, and social analysis. Induction
stovetop is environmentally sustainable as it produces no greenhouse gas emission,
consumes less energy and eliminates ecological footprint. Economically, the induction
stovetop costs 10% less than its gas counterpart. Finally, induction stovetop is socially
sustainable since it has negligible side effects, and does not put its users in danger of gas
leakage and heat exposure.
The advantages of the induction stovetop allow the new UBC Student Union
Building to function as a more sustainable unit. As a result, the new SUB can better serve
students and teachers providing a more enjoyable experience during their time at UBC. Disclaimer: “UBC SEEDS provides students with the opportunity to share the findings of their studies, as well as their opinions, conclusions and recommendations with the UBC community. The reader should bear in mind that this is a student project/report and is not an official document of UBC. Furthermore readers should bear in mind that these reports may not reflect the current status of activities at UBC. We urge you to contact the research persons mentioned in a report or the SEEDS Coordinator about the current status of the subject matter of a project/report.”
|
Genre | |
Type | |
Language |
eng
|
Series | |
Date Available |
2012-07-05
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0108331
|
URI | |
Affiliation | |
Campus | |
Peer Review Status |
Unreviewed
|
Scholarly Level |
Undergraduate
|
Rights URI | |
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International