- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- The general anti-avoidance rule: has it changed the...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
The general anti-avoidance rule: has it changed the face of tax avoidance? Tremblay, Janie
Abstract
Since time immemorial, there has been a (continual) duel between the taxing authorities and taxpayers. In Canada, this duel between Revenue Canada and taxpayers has become even more fierce over the past fifteen years. As a result, the Minister of Finance enacted the General Anti-Avoidance Rule ("GAAR") (section 245 of the Income Tax Act) which officially came into force on September 13, 1988. GAAR is intended to limit the boundaries of acceptable tax avoidance, but in a climate in which the ability to reduce taxes by use of tax avoidance schemes is a source of great pride, the far reaching scope and uncertain application of GAAR make it the most controversial section of the Act. These features also make GAAR the most promising tool by which to curtail tax avoidance. Accordingly, the purpose of this thesis is to assess whether or not GAAR has changed the face of tax avoidance, and if so, how? In addressing this issue, the thesis takes the reader through a step by step analysis of GAAR's genesis. It starts with a review of former subsection 245(1) and the judicial antiavoidance doctrines existing prior to GAAR. This is followed by an analysis of the policy turmoil, having fairness as its core issue, which led to the rule. The conclusion will include an assessment of the final product. This step by step analysis enables the reader to understand the shortcomings of the pre-GAAR methods of dealing with tax avoidance and, subsequently, GAAR's potential. However, as all judicial decisions relating to GAAR are pending, inference from the principles established in recent tax avoidance decisions will be the basis for assessing GAAR's potential to circumscribe effectively tax avoidance. Despite the lack of case law interpreting GAAR, this thesis suggests that current judicial trends reveal that GAAR's success is subject to the somewhat aleatoric judicial system of a society which encourages tax avoidance. It is submitted that, in the end, GAAR has not changed the face of tax avoidance; it has simply modified the way taxpayers may reduce their tax liability and limited the class of people who can avail themselves of the benefits of tax avoidance. Certainly, GAAR does not contribute to the government's espoused policy of fairness in taxation.
Item Metadata
Title |
The general anti-avoidance rule: has it changed the face of tax avoidance?
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1996
|
Description |
Since time immemorial, there has been a (continual) duel between the taxing authorities
and taxpayers. In Canada, this duel between Revenue Canada and taxpayers has become even
more fierce over the past fifteen years. As a result, the Minister of Finance enacted the General
Anti-Avoidance Rule ("GAAR") (section 245 of the Income Tax Act) which officially came into
force on September 13, 1988. GAAR is intended to limit the boundaries of acceptable tax
avoidance, but in a climate in which the ability to reduce taxes by use of tax avoidance schemes
is a source of great pride, the far reaching scope and uncertain application of GAAR make it the
most controversial section of the Act. These features also make GAAR the most promising tool
by which to curtail tax avoidance. Accordingly, the purpose of this thesis is to assess whether
or not GAAR has changed the face of tax avoidance, and if so, how?
In addressing this issue, the thesis takes the reader through a step by step analysis of
GAAR's genesis. It starts with a review of former subsection 245(1) and the judicial antiavoidance
doctrines existing prior to GAAR. This is followed by an analysis of the policy
turmoil, having fairness as its core issue, which led to the rule. The conclusion will include an
assessment of the final product. This step by step analysis enables the reader to understand the
shortcomings of the pre-GAAR methods of dealing with tax avoidance and, subsequently,
GAAR's potential. However, as all judicial decisions relating to GAAR are pending, inference
from the principles established in recent tax avoidance decisions will be the basis for assessing
GAAR's potential to circumscribe effectively tax avoidance. Despite the lack of case law interpreting GAAR, this thesis suggests that current judicial
trends reveal that GAAR's success is subject to the somewhat aleatoric judicial system of a
society which encourages tax avoidance. It is submitted that, in the end, GAAR has not changed
the face of tax avoidance; it has simply modified the way taxpayers may reduce their tax liability
and limited the class of people who can avail themselves of the benefits of tax avoidance.
Certainly, GAAR does not contribute to the government's espoused policy of fairness in
taxation.
|
Extent |
8427874 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-02-06
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0077554
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1996-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.