- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Locke’s theory of toleration and its critics
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Locke’s theory of toleration and its critics Raabe, Peter Bruno
Abstract
It has been argued that Locke's theory of toleration is not only flawed in some respects, but that it lacks relevance for present day North American society since it addresses only the conditions and concerns of Locke's own civil society and historical period. But a detailed analysis of the arguments in the Letter, along with an examination of the criticisms of his letter levelled at him by his contemporary, Jonas Proast, especially, on the issue of the use of force to promote belief, shows that Locke's theory of toleration is in fact logically sound and quite rigorous. Furthermore, an examination of some of Locke's other writings reveals that Locke has based his theory of toleration on sound political and epistemological foundations. A scrutiny of later criticisms by Joseph Priestley, Susan Mendus, Jeremy Waldron, and John Rawls shows that they also fail to diminish either the force of Locke's arguments or the relevance of his theory of toleration to present day issues surrounding religious freedom. Although Locke's intolerance of atheists is shown to be misplaced, it is argued that his approach to universal religious toleration is not at odds with modern approaches from individual rights. It is also argued that he is not mistaken in his assumption that matters of state can, and must, be separated from matters of religion if the peace and security of a state are to be maintained. Locke's theory of toleration is therefore shown to be neither parochial nor historically bound.
Item Metadata
Title |
Locke’s theory of toleration and its critics
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1994
|
Description |
It has been argued that Locke's theory of toleration is not only
flawed in some respects, but that it lacks relevance for present day
North American society since it addresses only the conditions and
concerns of Locke's own civil society and historical period. But a
detailed analysis of the arguments in the Letter, along with an
examination of the criticisms of his letter levelled at him by his
contemporary, Jonas Proast, especially, on the issue of the use of
force to promote belief, shows that Locke's theory of toleration is in
fact logically sound and quite rigorous. Furthermore, an examination
of some of Locke's other writings reveals that Locke has based his
theory of toleration on sound political and epistemological
foundations. A scrutiny of later criticisms by Joseph Priestley,
Susan Mendus, Jeremy Waldron, and John Rawls shows that they also fail
to diminish either the force of Locke's arguments or the relevance of
his theory of toleration to present day issues surrounding religious
freedom. Although Locke's intolerance of atheists is shown to be
misplaced, it is argued that his approach to universal religious
toleration is not at odds with modern approaches from individual
rights. It is also argued that he is not mistaken in his assumption
that matters of state can, and must, be separated from matters of
religion if the peace and security of a state are to be maintained.
Locke's theory of toleration is therefore shown to be neither
parochial nor historically bound.
|
Extent |
5544468 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-02-10
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0087125
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1995-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.