- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- British Columbia principals and the evaluation of teaching
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
British Columbia principals and the evaluation of teaching Edgar, William
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the views of British Columbia principals with regard to the formal evaluation of teaching. Four major concepts were addressed a) the purpose of evaluation; b) the process of evaluation; c) the need for further principal training in evaluation; and, d) obstacles to carrying out evaluation. The sex of principals and years of experience as a principal were identified for further analysis because these variables are absent in the literature on formal evaluation. The data consisted of relevant clauses from all 75 British Columbia school district collective agreements and responses to a survey sent to the members of the British Columbia Principals' and Vice-Principals' Association. The achieved sample is 188 principals. The findings of this study show the conduct of formal evaluation is a responsibility willingly accepted by principals and that it is a function they consider they carry out well. Collective agreements say little about the purpose of evaluation. The majority of principals believe the most important purpose of evaluation is teacher growth and development. Female principals indicate a stronger orientation towards teacher growth and development than males but this difference may also be related to principals' different experience levels. Relatively few evaluations are carried out and only a very small proportion result in "less than satisfactory" reports. Evaluations leading to "satisfactory" and "less than satisfactory" reports are characterised in very different terms by principals. Anecdotal responses support the assertion made in the literature that principals believe they already know who their 'weak' teachers are before conducting an evaluation. British Columbia principals consider time as the primary obstacle to carrying out formal evaluation. Evaluation cycles and site management responsibilities are perceived as the major time consumers. Neither size of staff nor percentage of teaching time were identified as significant time barriers by the respondents. Principals do not label themselves as under-trained for the responsibility of formal evaluator of teaching. Moreover, master's specialty and previous training are not linked to further training needs nor to how well principals believe they do evaluation. Three policy recommendations emerge from this study: (1) to re-assess the role of principal as evaluator in the light of their wider responsibilities; (2) to consider extending the role of formal evaluator to educators other than school-based administrators; and (3) to re-assess the value of formal evaluation as currently practised.
Item Metadata
Title |
British Columbia principals and the evaluation of teaching
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1996
|
Description |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the views of
British Columbia principals with regard to the formal
evaluation of teaching. Four major concepts were addressed
a) the purpose of evaluation; b) the process of evaluation;
c) the need for further principal training in evaluation;
and, d) obstacles to carrying out evaluation. The sex of
principals and years of experience as a principal were
identified for further analysis because these variables are
absent in the literature on formal evaluation.
The data consisted of relevant clauses from all 75
British Columbia school district collective agreements and
responses to a survey sent to the members of the British
Columbia Principals' and Vice-Principals' Association. The
achieved sample is 188 principals. The findings of this
study show the conduct of formal evaluation is a
responsibility willingly accepted by principals and that it
is a function they consider they carry out well.
Collective agreements say little about the purpose of
evaluation. The majority of principals believe the most
important purpose of evaluation is teacher growth and
development. Female principals indicate a stronger
orientation towards teacher growth and development than
males but this difference may also be related to principals'
different experience levels.
Relatively few evaluations are carried out and only a
very small proportion result in "less than satisfactory"
reports. Evaluations leading to "satisfactory" and "less
than satisfactory" reports are characterised in very
different terms by principals. Anecdotal responses support
the assertion made in the literature that principals believe
they already know who their 'weak' teachers are before
conducting an evaluation.
British Columbia principals consider time as the
primary obstacle to carrying out formal evaluation.
Evaluation cycles and site management responsibilities are
perceived as the major time consumers. Neither size of
staff nor percentage of teaching time were identified as
significant time barriers by the respondents.
Principals do not label themselves as under-trained for
the responsibility of formal evaluator of teaching.
Moreover, master's specialty and previous training are not
linked to further training needs nor to how well principals
believe they do evaluation.
Three policy recommendations emerge from this study:
(1) to re-assess the role of principal as evaluator in the
light of their wider responsibilities; (2) to consider
extending the role of formal evaluator to educators other
than school-based administrators; and (3) to re-assess the
value of formal evaluation as currently practised.
|
Extent |
7698791 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-02-12
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0055018
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1996-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.