- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- The accuracy of deflection-lines derived from digital...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
The accuracy of deflection-lines derived from digital elevation models Christie, David Alexander
Abstract
Long-reaching skyline cable yarding systems have seen increased use within the British Columbia coastal forest industry. Deflection-line analysis, which estimates the maximum yarding distance and locates the harvest boundary, is the key component in planning for skyline systems. Traditional deflection-line analysis involves field surveys which may be very difficult to perform in the terrain associated with skylines. As an alternative, deflection-lines may be derived from Digital Elevation Models (DEMs). Concern regarding the elevational accuracy of the topographic forest planning maps used to create the DEMs has limited their use for deflection-line analysis. Better understanding of the magnitude and nature of elevational errors and their effect upon deflection-line analysis are needed before DEM-derived deflection-lines may be used with confidence. This study was performed in cooperation with Canadian Forest Products Limited (Canfor) in Woss, British Columbia (B.C.). Deflection-line analyses were performed for DEM-derived deflection-lines to test for error in yarding distance estimates. Errors in yarding distance estimates for DEM-derived deflection-lines were caused by interactions between some or all of the following: the terrain shape (concavity/convexity), large elevational errors and their location on the deflection-line, and the deflection-line length. While a majority of yarding distance estimates from DEM-derived deflection-lines were not in error (70%), the erroneous estimates may result in costly planning errors. Restricting the use of DEM-derived deflection-lines to the efficient pre-planning of field surveys could help avoid these mistakes. A blunder was detected in one of the study cutblock maps. Distortions were discovered in the maps for two other study cutbiocks where photogrammetrically derived and ground surveyed maps had been joined through rubber sheeting. While random error was detected in the analyses, systematic error appeared to contribute more to both the general level of elevational error and to the presence of large elevational errors. Different types of systematic error were detected, with at least some types evident in all of the deflection-line comparisons. Smoothing error was observed where terrain variation had been reduced or eliminated, and positional errors were the most common and influential systematic errors detected. The positional error of map features, and positional error introduced using traditional surveying methods, may also affect operational field surveying of deflection-lines, logging roads, and harvest boundaries. The presence of positional error and its subsequent effects upon harvest planning is either not known or is ignored altogether. Detecting the presence of systematic error in topographic forest planning maps is the first step towards using DEMs confidently for deflection-line analysis. Further studies involving the effects of positional error on DEM elevational error will allow the DEMs to be predicted and subsequently accounted for. Advances in map creation, computers, and Geographic Information Systems will allow for the acquisition and manipulation of more accurate digital elevation data now and in the future.
Item Metadata
Title |
The accuracy of deflection-lines derived from digital elevation models
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1994
|
Description |
Long-reaching skyline cable yarding systems have seen increased use within the British
Columbia coastal forest industry. Deflection-line analysis, which estimates the
maximum yarding distance and locates the harvest boundary, is the key component in
planning for skyline systems. Traditional deflection-line analysis involves field surveys
which may be very difficult to perform in the terrain associated with skylines. As an
alternative, deflection-lines may be derived from Digital Elevation Models (DEMs).
Concern regarding the elevational accuracy of the topographic forest planning maps
used to create the DEMs has limited their use for deflection-line analysis. Better
understanding of the magnitude and nature of elevational errors and their effect upon
deflection-line analysis are needed before DEM-derived deflection-lines may be used
with confidence.
This study was performed in cooperation with Canadian Forest Products Limited
(Canfor) in Woss, British Columbia (B.C.). Deflection-line analyses were performed for
DEM-derived deflection-lines to test for error in yarding distance estimates. Errors in
yarding distance estimates for DEM-derived deflection-lines were caused by interactions
between some or all of the following: the terrain shape (concavity/convexity), large
elevational errors and their location on the deflection-line, and the deflection-line length.
While a majority of yarding distance estimates from DEM-derived deflection-lines were
not in error (70%), the erroneous estimates may result in costly planning errors. Restricting the use of DEM-derived deflection-lines to the efficient pre-planning of field
surveys could help avoid these mistakes.
A blunder was detected in one of the study cutblock maps. Distortions were discovered
in the maps for two other study cutbiocks where photogrammetrically derived and
ground surveyed maps had been joined through rubber sheeting. While random error
was detected in the analyses, systematic error appeared to contribute more to both the
general level of elevational error and to the presence of large elevational errors.
Different types of systematic error were detected, with at least some types evident in all
of the deflection-line comparisons. Smoothing error was observed where terrain
variation had been reduced or eliminated, and positional errors were the most common
and influential systematic errors detected. The positional error of map features, and
positional error introduced using traditional surveying methods, may also affect
operational field surveying of deflection-lines, logging roads, and harvest boundaries.
The presence of positional error and its subsequent effects upon harvest planning is
either not known or is ignored altogether.
Detecting the presence of systematic error in topographic forest planning maps is the
first step towards using DEMs confidently for deflection-line analysis. Further studies
involving the effects of positional error on DEM elevational error will allow the DEMs
to be predicted and subsequently accounted for. Advances in map creation, computers,
and Geographic Information Systems will allow for the acquisition and manipulation of
more accurate digital elevation data now and in the future.
|
Extent |
3599844 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-02-26
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0075251
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1994-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.