- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Analysis of personality ratings using the social relations...
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Analysis of personality ratings using the social relations model Reynolds, Shawn Patrick
Abstract
Three datasets (N=90, 65, and 88) each provided three modes of assessment of the Big Five factors: Questionnaire, self-rating and peer-ratings. All participants completed the questionnaire before meeting in small discussion groups; afterward, participants rated one another and themselves. Kenny's Social Relations Model (SRM) was used (a) to partition target, rater and relationship components of the rating data, and (b) to correlate the three stable component scores with the questionnaire and self-rating measures. For each of the Big Five, such statistics provide measures of reliability and validity as well as indexing projection, reciprocity, and self-enhancement. It was hypothesized that (a) the three assessment modes would converge, (b) target variance would be stronger than in previous research, (c) self-ratings would be more positive than other-ratings, and (d) projection would be significant but reciprocity would not. In general, these hypotheses were confirmed.
Item Metadata
Title |
Analysis of personality ratings using the social relations model
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1994
|
Description |
Three datasets (N=90, 65, and 88) each provided three modes of assessment of the Big Five factors: Questionnaire, self-rating and peer-ratings. All participants completed the questionnaire before meeting in small discussion groups; afterward, participants rated one another and themselves. Kenny's Social Relations Model (SRM) was used (a) to partition target, rater and relationship components of the rating data, and (b) to correlate the three stable component scores with the questionnaire and self-rating measures. For each of the Big Five, such statistics provide measures of reliability and validity as well as indexing projection, reciprocity, and self-enhancement. It was hypothesized that (a) the three assessment modes would converge, (b) target
variance would be stronger than in previous research, (c) self-ratings would be more positive than other-ratings, and (d) projection would be significant but reciprocity would not. In general, these hypotheses were confirmed.
|
Extent |
2982206 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-03-06
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0087584
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1994-11
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.