- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- The child at the centre : rethinking child protection
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
The child at the centre : rethinking child protection Hall, Margaret Isabel
Abstract
This thesis considers the central problems posed by child protection in liberal societies and how those problems have played out in, and are addressed through, the legislative and administrative reforms in British Columbia in the 1990s. Child protection brings two important social values into conflict: on one side, liberal (adult) individualism (including the autonomy/privacy of the family as a counterweight to the State) and, on the other, the communal interest in child well being (including humanitarian and civil/moral order interests) which, in liberal societies, is delegated to the State. This conflict is a feature of liberal societies and cannot be, truly, resolved; child protection requires choices and decisions about the values/interests on either side of the conflict. British Columbia's new "child centred" child welfare system is about making those decisions on an individual basis focused on the child. The new Ministry contains a range of options and approaches ("intervention" and "support") and does not, per se, endorse one over the other. The professional task is to choose the appropriate response; "child centred" practice means that "appropriate" is defined from the beginning with reference to the child. The conflict between family privacy and the communal interest in child well being has previously been managed, or contained, within the "liberal compromise" (Dingwall, Eekelaar and Murray, 1983) , that the State may inspect the family provided that its agents make the best of what they find. The most significant effect of the compromise had been to minimise identified mistreatment. By the 1980s, however, it was increasingly clear (to professionals and the public) that neither children nor family privacy were adequately protected within the compromise. "Non-interventionist" child protection, which appeared to reconcile the problematic by subsuming child protection within family support, became the modern reform paradigm (as a response to perceived failure, and as an idea with wide political appeal, resonating with liberal norms of privacy and conflict avoidance). However (as the Report of the Gove Inquiry would show) supporting families and protecting children are not synonymous. The legitimacy and coherence of the "noninterventionist" paradigm depends on the disappearance (explained as both respecting family privacy and the professionalism of child protection workers) of child deaths (the most obvious form of child suffering). After the Gove Report's publicisation of the sometimes fatal (for the child) consequences of family support and the disappearance of dead children inside "the system" (dramatically, and very publicly, cast as professional back covering, shockingly indifferent to the child at the centre) the non-interventionist paradigm appeared untenable. It is too early to tell how the Ministry's "child centred" decision making will better protect children (and family autonomy), however, several features of the post-Gove reformsamendments moving the focus of the Child, Family and Community Service Act away from "non-intervention", the structure of the single Ministry and the regular inquiries and reports of the Children's Commissioner- do have the potential to preclude a comeback for the non-interventionist paradigm (despite the paradigm's political, cultural and professional appeal) and may also create an organisational and (professional) cultural context conducive to child centred decision making.
Item Metadata
Title |
The child at the centre : rethinking child protection
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1998
|
Description |
This thesis considers the central problems posed by child protection in liberal societies and
how those problems have played out in, and are addressed through, the legislative and
administrative reforms in British Columbia in the 1990s. Child protection brings two
important social values into conflict: on one side, liberal (adult) individualism (including
the autonomy/privacy of the family as a counterweight to the State) and, on the other, the
communal interest in child well being (including humanitarian and civil/moral order
interests) which, in liberal societies, is delegated to the State. This conflict is a feature of
liberal societies and cannot be, truly, resolved; child protection requires choices and
decisions about the values/interests on either side of the conflict. British Columbia's new
"child centred" child welfare system is about making those decisions on an individual basis
focused on the child. The new Ministry contains a range of options and approaches
("intervention" and "support") and does not, per se, endorse one over the other. The
professional task is to choose the appropriate response; "child centred" practice means
that "appropriate" is defined from the beginning with reference to the child.
The conflict between family privacy and the communal interest in child well being has
previously been managed, or contained, within the "liberal compromise" (Dingwall,
Eekelaar and Murray, 1983) , that the State may inspect the family provided that its agents
make the best of what they find. The most significant effect of the compromise had been
to minimise identified mistreatment. By the 1980s, however, it was increasingly clear (to
professionals and the public) that neither children nor family privacy were adequately
protected within the compromise. "Non-interventionist" child protection, which appeared
to reconcile the problematic by subsuming child protection within family support, became
the modern reform paradigm (as a response to perceived failure, and as an idea with wide
political appeal, resonating with liberal norms of privacy and conflict avoidance).
However (as the Report of the Gove Inquiry would show) supporting families and
protecting children are not synonymous. The legitimacy and coherence of the "noninterventionist"
paradigm depends on the disappearance (explained as both respecting
family privacy and the professionalism of child protection workers) of child deaths (the
most obvious form of child suffering). After the Gove Report's publicisation of the
sometimes fatal (for the child) consequences of family support and the disappearance of
dead children inside "the system" (dramatically, and very publicly, cast as professional
back covering, shockingly indifferent to the child at the centre) the non-interventionist
paradigm appeared untenable.
It is too early to tell how the Ministry's "child centred" decision making will better protect
children (and family autonomy), however, several features of the post-Gove reformsamendments
moving the focus of the Child, Family and Community Service Act away
from "non-intervention", the structure of the single Ministry and the regular inquiries and
reports of the Children's Commissioner- do have the potential to preclude a comeback for
the non-interventionist paradigm (despite the paradigm's political, cultural and
professional appeal) and may also create an organisational and (professional) cultural
context conducive to child centred decision making.
|
Extent |
13178200 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-05-04
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0077573
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1998-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.