Go to  Advanced Search

Objectivity and responsibility in moral education

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Reilly, Elizabeth
dc.date.accessioned 2009-06-02T21:00:51Z
dc.date.available 2009-06-02T21:00:51Z
dc.date.copyright 1998 en
dc.date.issued 2009-06-02T21:00:51Z
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2429/8656
dc.description.abstract The central problem addressed in this thesis has two parts. First, how can an educator respect the developing autonomy of a student's rational capacities while nurturing'the development of particular moral sensibilities and a particular moral perspective? Second, if a moral educator challenges a group of students to consider an alternative moral position, how can she or he be justified in presenting the new perspective as superior to the old one? My argument, in summary, is that an ideal of strong objectivity, as it is conceived by Sandra Harding in the context of feminist standpoint theory, works as a set of standards against which to evaluate the adequacy of one's moral perspective, and it offers a valuable means for comparing this perspective to others. Strong objectivity is an ideal which employs a set of standards including respect, reflexivity, and critical evaluation of social situations to challenge inquirers to maximise their objectivity. They do this through recognising and testing not only the content of their knowledge claims but also the purpose these claims play in the development of research programs, A commitment to strong objectivity entails attempting to understand the partiality of one's own perspective and recognising how that partiality distorts one's perception. The process of learning from others' perspectives is central to revising and enriching one's own perspective, and this revision and enrichment is an . ongoing responsibility for any teacher. Through the application of strong objectivity to moral theory building, a moral educator can be justified in believing that her or his own moral perspective is the most adequate one available. If a moral educator understands Harding's conception of strong objectivity, and embraces it as an ideal, the result will be a more justly equitable learning environment and a more complete understanding of the moral perspective which is being developed within the classroom. These are fundamental to the legitimacy of the work of a moral educator. en
dc.format.extent 6200636 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng en
dc.relation.ispartofseries UBC Retrospective Theses Digitization Project [http://www.library.ubc.ca/archives/retro_theses/]
dc.subject Education - Moral and ethical aspects en
dc.subject Objectivity en
dc.subject Feminist theory en
dc.subject Knowledge, Theory of en
dc.title Objectivity and responsibility in moral education en
dc.type Electronic Thesis or Dissertation
dc.degree.name Doctor of Philosophy - PhD en
dc.degree.discipline Educational Studies en
dc.degree.grantor University of British Columbia
dc.date.graduation 1998-05 en
dc.degree.campus UBCV en


Files in this item

Files Size Format Description   View
ubc_1998-272338.pdf 6.200Mb Adobe Portable Document Format   View/Open
 

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

All items in cIRcle are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

UBC Library
1961 East Mall
Vancouver, B.C.
Canada V6T 1Z1
Tel: 604-822-6375
Fax: 604-822-3893