- Library Home /
- Search Collections /
- Open Collections /
- Browse Collections /
- UBC Theses and Dissertations /
- Objectivity and responsibility in moral education
Open Collections
UBC Theses and Dissertations
UBC Theses and Dissertations
Objectivity and responsibility in moral education Reilly, Elizabeth
Abstract
The central problem addressed in this thesis has two parts. First, how can an educator respect the developing autonomy of a student's rational capacities while nurturing'the development of particular moral sensibilities and a particular moral perspective? Second, if a moral educator challenges a group of students to consider an alternative moral position, how can she or he be justified in presenting the new perspective as superior to the old one? My argument, in summary, is that an ideal of strong objectivity, as it is conceived by Sandra Harding in the context of feminist standpoint theory, works as a set of standards against which to evaluate the adequacy of one's moral perspective, and it offers a valuable means for comparing this perspective to others. Strong objectivity is an ideal which employs a set of standards including respect, reflexivity, and critical evaluation of social situations to challenge inquirers to maximise their objectivity. They do this through recognising and testing not only the content of their knowledge claims but also the purpose these claims play in the development of research programs, A commitment to strong objectivity entails attempting to understand the partiality of one's own perspective and recognising how that partiality distorts one's perception. The process of learning from others' perspectives is central to revising and enriching one's own perspective, and this revision and enrichment is an . ongoing responsibility for any teacher. Through the application of strong objectivity to moral theory building, a moral educator can be justified in believing that her or his own moral perspective is the most adequate one available. If a moral educator understands Harding's conception of strong objectivity, and embraces it as an ideal, the result will be a more justly equitable learning environment and a more complete understanding of the moral perspective which is being developed within the classroom. These are fundamental to the legitimacy of the work of a moral educator.
Item Metadata
Title |
Objectivity and responsibility in moral education
|
Creator | |
Publisher |
University of British Columbia
|
Date Issued |
1998
|
Description |
The central problem addressed in this thesis has two parts. First, how
can an educator respect the developing autonomy of a student's rational
capacities while nurturing'the development of particular moral sensibilities and a
particular moral perspective? Second, if a moral educator challenges a group of
students to consider an alternative moral position, how can she or he be justified
in presenting the new perspective as superior to the old one?
My argument, in summary, is that an ideal of strong objectivity, as it is
conceived by Sandra Harding in the context of feminist standpoint theory, works
as a set of standards against which to evaluate the adequacy of one's moral
perspective, and it offers a valuable means for comparing this perspective to
others. Strong objectivity is an ideal which employs a set of standards including
respect, reflexivity, and critical evaluation of social situations to challenge
inquirers to maximise their objectivity. They do this through recognising and
testing not only the content of their knowledge claims but also the purpose these
claims play in the development of research programs, A commitment to strong
objectivity entails attempting to understand the partiality of one's own
perspective and recognising how that partiality distorts one's perception.
The process of learning from others' perspectives is central to revising
and enriching one's own perspective, and this revision and enrichment is an .
ongoing responsibility for any teacher. Through the application of strong
objectivity to moral theory building, a moral educator can be justified in believing that her or his own moral perspective is the most adequate one available. If a
moral educator understands Harding's conception of strong objectivity, and
embraces it as an ideal, the result will be a more justly equitable learning
environment and a more complete understanding of the moral perspective which
is being developed within the classroom. These are fundamental to the
legitimacy of the work of a moral educator.
|
Extent |
6200636 bytes
|
Genre | |
Type | |
File Format |
application/pdf
|
Language |
eng
|
Date Available |
2009-06-02
|
Provider |
Vancouver : University of British Columbia Library
|
Rights |
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.
|
DOI |
10.14288/1.0055541
|
URI | |
Degree | |
Program | |
Affiliation | |
Degree Grantor |
University of British Columbia
|
Graduation Date |
1998-05
|
Campus | |
Scholarly Level |
Graduate
|
Aggregated Source Repository |
DSpace
|
Item Media
Item Citations and Data
Rights
For non-commercial purposes only, such as research, private study and education. Additional conditions apply, see Terms of Use https://open.library.ubc.ca/terms_of_use.