Go to  Advanced Search

Please note that cIRcle is currently being upgraded to DSpace v5.1. The upgrade means that the cIRcle service will *not* be accepting new submissions from 5:00 PM on September 1, 2015 until 5:00 PM on September 4, 2015. All cIRcle material will still be accessible during this period. Apologies for any inconvenience.

Environmental planning for ARD waste : land-dried biosolids and ARD waste rock experiment

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Renken, Karin
dc.date.accessioned 2009-06-23T22:33:28Z
dc.date.available 2009-06-23T22:33:28Z
dc.date.issued 2000
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/2429/9541
dc.description.abstract Different types of biosolids used as soil amendments have been demonstrated to result in rapid revegetation and environmentally friendly reclamation even in problematic sites such as metalcontaminated and/or acid generating spoils. This paper presents laboratory results of the effect of landdried biosolids on acid generating (AG) waste rock. The impact was determined through analysis of water percolated through soil columns. The experiment consisted of four columns that were subjected to weekly water additions over 8 to 10 hour cycles. Materials in the columns were layered in various combinations using land-dried biosolids, neutral waste rock, AG fines and AG waste rock. The leaching schedule was designed to simulate 17 weeks of non-winter field conditions. Percolate water quality was monitored weekly for: pH, conductivity, sulphate, acidity, alkalinity, dissolved metals and hardness. Waste rock and biosolids were characterized in terms of pH, particle size distribution, and nutrient and total metal concentrations. Acid- Base Accounting (ABA) was performed for both the neutral and AG waste rock and the AG fines. All four columns were saturated and reached the desired baseline condition for data comparison after two leaching cycles. There appeared to be a significant difference between the mass released from columns treated with land-dried biosolids when compared with the control column results. For example, when comparing Column 2 results with its control column results, the mass released from Column 2 between week 3 and week 17 was roughly 50% lower in: acidity at pH 4.5, acidity at pH 8.3, sulphate, aluminum, cobalt, manganese, and phosphorus; 60% lower in iron and arsenic; and 80% lower in zinc and cadmium. The mass collected from Column 2 was about 30% higher for calcium, 45% for hardness and 134% for magnesium in compared with control column results. en
dc.format.extent 1652610 bytes
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso eng en
dc.relation.ispartof B.C. Mine Reclamation Symposium 2000 en
dc.relation.ispartofseries British Columbia Mine Reclamation Symposium 2000 en
dc.title Environmental planning for ARD waste : land-dried biosolids and ARD waste rock experiment en
dc.type Text en
dc.type.text Conference Paper en
dc.description.affiliation Applied Science, Faculty of en
dc.description.reviewstatus Unreviewed en
dc.rights.copyright British Columbia Technical and Research Committee on Reclamation en
dc.description.scholarlevel Other en

Files in this item

Files Size Format Description   View
2000 - Renken - Environmental Planning for ARD Waste.pdf 1.652Mb Adobe Portable Document Format   View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

All items in cIRcle are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved.

UBC Library
1961 East Mall
Vancouver, B.C.
Canada V6T 1Z1
Tel: 604-822-6375
Fax: 604-822-3893